A head to head comparison of a 2016 Ford Escape to a 2016 Mazda CX-3 in Engine Performance.


 
  • Jones Ford Buckeye Journal
  • Jul 22nd 2017 - 297 days ago
  • Target City, State
  • Share This Story

Compared To Mazda CX-3 2016



The Escape’s standard 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl. produces 22 more horsepower (168 vs. 146) and 24 lbs.-ft. more torque (170 vs. 146) than the CX-3’s 2.0 DOHC 4 cyl. The Escape’s optional 1.6 turbo 4 cyl. produces 32 more horsepower (178 vs. 146) and 38 lbs.-ft. more torque (184 vs. 146) than the CX-3’s 2.0 DOHC 4 cyl. The Escape’s optional 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. produces 94 more horsepower (240 vs. 146) and 124 lbs.-ft. more torque (270 vs. 146) than the CX-3’s 2.0 DOHC 4 cyl.

As tested in Motor Trend the Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost is faster than the Mazda CX-3:

Escape

CX-3

Zero to 60 MPH

6.8 sec

8.6 sec

Quarter Mile

15.2 sec

16.6 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

88.8 MPH

83 MPH